We have seen This kind of movie at our law firm on a few occasions. A maladjusted parent attempts to enlist the machinery of the state in a bid to gain custody by producing false or trumped-up allegations of abuse against the various other spouse or co-parent.
Earlier This kind of week, the Michigan Court of Appeals affirmed a St. Clair County Family Court judgment which awarded Father sole legal custody along with limited Mother’s parenting schedule to minimal supervised sessions largely on the basis of Mother’s series of unsupported allegations of abuse along with neglect made to CPS.
These unfounded allegations of abuse along with neglect, combined with Mother’s overall campaign of alienation against Father, left Mother with only two hours of supervised parenting time. While the item appears she brought This kind of on by her own actions, we never like to see a parent stuck with such limited parenting time.
In This kind of case, however, Mother was her own worst enemy. The trial testimony not only featured credible evidence of parental alienation along with unfounded CPS complaints, Mother also subjected the children to multiple forensic interviews, while she violated the family court’s temporary parenting orders; a recipe for disaster to be sure.
Additionally, to make matters even worse for the children, Mother assaulted Father on several occasions, sometimes in front of these poor children. As a result, the older child at This kind of point has issues of his own along with Mother is actually “overwhelmed” by her son’s issues.
coming from a professional perspective, we note here at our law firm which the trial court’s decision was deemed to be well-reasoned along with supported by applicable authority. With regard to the appellant-Mother’s challenge to her limited parenting time, the Court of Appeals stated:
various other than to argue which she was justified in reporting the issues to CPS along with which she loved along with cared for the children, defendant has done little by way of argument to demonstrate which the trial court erred in determining parenting time. Trial evidence supported the factors mitigating against greater parenting time, along with the trial court’s findings with respect to parenting time were not against the great weight of the evidence. Importantly, defendant has not been removed coming from the children’s lives as she has weekly parenting time, along with the trial court’s order –as the item must- left open the possibility which she can be granted more time within the future.
So the Mother in This kind of unfortunate case will need to earn herself a spot back into the lives of her children. Thus, she would certainly be well-advised to start playing by the rules: i.e. following the court orders issued in her divorce case.
The simple lesson here is actually, even when your adult relationship has deteriorated to the point of divorce, you must make every attempt to co-parent with the person with whom you procreated for the sake of the children.