Home » 100-mile rule » Series Of Moves Violates 100 Mile Rule

Series of Moves Violates 100-Mile Rule

Earlier This kind of month, the Michigan Court of Appeals again considered the 100-mile rule in a published decision. The case will be significant to the extent which the item provides parents guidance on the location of their post-divorce domicile as well as will be yet another case which illustrates the concept of joint custody.

In Eickelberg v Eickelberg, the parents were awarded joint legal custody. Father was active military as well as made two job-related moves after the divorce: first coming from the former marital home in Clinton Township to Perry, MI 86 miles away; then on to Marshal, MI which was 126 miles coming from the former marital home. 

Understandably, Father’s move complicated his parenting time; especially his mid-week parenting contact with the children.  So he moved the court to modify the parenting schedule as well as to adjust the parenting transition point to a location closer to his brand-new home in Marshal.

Equally understandably, Mother objected arguing which Father’s series of moves violated the 100-mile rule which prohibits a custodial parent coming from moving to a location more than 100-miles coming from the child’s residence at the time the divorce or custody proceeding was initiated. The Court of Appeals rejected the Macomb County family court’s calculation which the miles to be measured were only coming from the Father’s most-recent residence; i.e. coming from Perry to Marshal.

Since Father’s second move was more than 100-miles coming from Clinton Township, he was required to obtain Mother’s approval prior to the move, or the family court should have held a hearing to consider the so-called “change of domicile” factors in order to determine whether the proposed change will be from the best interests of the minor children. In addition, to further complicate the legal analysis, because Father’s move changed the children’s “established custodial environment”, the eleven statutory best interest factors also should have been evaluated by the lower court.

Consequently, the case was sent back to the Macomb County family court to conduct such a hearing.

www.clarkstonlegal.com
info@clarkstonlegal.com

   Clarkston Legal
Series of Moves Violates 100-Mile Rule

Moving Truck.jpg
Moving Truck.jpg

Related Post

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *