Home » Divorce Alternatives » Argument For Legislation Limiting Children's Exposure To Second Hand Smoke

Argument For Legislation Limiting Children's Exposure to Second Hand Smoke

Children along with infants are especially susceptible to the effects of second hand cigarette smoke. which is actually because young children whose lung capacity as related to their body weight is actually larger than which of an adult, their immune system is actually not as developed as which of an adult, along with they are less likely to complain along with / or remove themselves via the environment which causes the exposure. In some other words, children are biologically geared to inhale more of the toxins present in cigarette smoke than their adult counterparts. Second hand smoke exposures children to quite a few carcinogens (cancer causing substances), along with when the environment is actually such which air flow is actually limited, such as inside a home or vehicle, those carcinogens are especially concentrated. There are more than four thousand substances present in tobacco smoke, more than forty of which are known carcinogens. These substances include formaldehyde, arsenic, vinyl chloride, lead, cadmium along with nickel, as well as a host of some other chemicals which are completely unpronounceable.

The effects of environmental tobacco smoke range via the reliably benign to serious health consequences. The irony of tobacco smoke is actually which the chemicals which are present in second hand smoke are often more concentrated than the smoke which a smoker takes into his or her lungs. Among the effects which second hand smoke has on children are increases inside frequency of upper along with lower respiratory tract infections, an increase inside severity or frequency of existing asthma episodes along with / or symptoms, a reduction inside flow of oxygen to tissues along with reduced lung function in general, along with an increase of fluid inside middle ear. Second hand smoke has also been associated with frequent ear infections, throat infections, an increase inside frequency along with severity of colds along with sore throats, poor or slowed growth, childhood cancers, along with Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS). Second hand smoke is actually thought to be responsible for more than 10% of all cases of childhood asthma, more than 16% of all physician office visits for cough along with more than 20% of all lung infections in children under the age of 5. Smoking is actually also liable for quite a few children's deaths via cigarette-related home fire.

There is actually little doubt which adults are aware of the overall dangers of cigarette smoke. Less than 10% of individuals believe which second hand smoke presents no danger whatever to the non-smoker. However, many people are not aware of how the effects of second hand smoke are compounded in children. Because of the increased danger of tobacco smoke, several states are considering legislation which could ban smoking around children under a certain age (generally fifteen) in any enclosed area, especially a vehicle.

Arguably, smoking is actually not against the law for any individual over the age of eighteen. Therefore, many adults do not consider their smoking as anything some other than a legal right. Any attempts to limit which right are generally met with significant resistance along with protest. However, as cigarette smoke is actually so dangerous to others, especially children, which can be argued which the only way to prevent harmful effects to non-smokers is actually to effect legislation which limits the rights of smokers. To date, most states have initiated some form of indoor smoking bans. These bans have been met with protest along with resistance via smokers along with non-smokers alike. The smokers protest which they have a legal right to smoke along with the non-smokers protest which the government is actually limiting the rights of the smoker, along with which those limitations may lead to the limitation of some other rights. Non-smokers which are in favor of legislation which limits the rights of smokers argument which the legislation could not deny the right of a smoker to smoke, yet could instead enforce the right of the non-smoker to remain healthy. Much like the use of alcohol, the use of cigarettes could, under the enactment of such legislation, be legal only inside sense which such use could not violate the rights of others. As alcohol is actually legal only in as much as which does not endanger others, so could the use of tobacco be legal only in as much as which does not endanger others.

To date, Arkansas, Louisiana, Washington, Vermont, along with Texas have already initiated some form of legislation which bans smoking around young children. Many states are ordering which children involved in custody disputes along with / or dispute cases are provided that has a smoke free environment. However, these cases are often the result of one parent complaining about the some other parent's smoking around the children. Furthermore, as the courts are intervening in a child's home environment, there is actually the legal system must either stop requiring a smoking ban in such cases or which which must apply the ban uniformly across every household, not necessarily the ones involved in civil litigation. Children's rights groups are calling the exposure of young children to second hand smoke a form of child abuse along with are rallying for legislation which limits the smoking of any individual around children. In Arkansas, any individual who is actually dealing violating the ban against exposing children to second hand smoke can be fined $ 25, yet can avoid the fine if they show proof of enrollment in a stop smoking program.

which can be argued which legislation which bans smoking around children, in cars, homes, or some other enclosed areas, is actually a position which places the health of children above the bad habits of the adults which care for them along with above the civil liberties of those adults . Regardless of their oppositions, adults must realize which current research overwhelmingly indicates which the effects of second hand smoke on children are predominately negative along with which these effects must be curved in any way possible along with as quickly as possible. With many states already employing statewide smoking bans which protect all non-smokers via the effects of tobacco smoke, which must be realized which states can not enact such legislation without also considering what they can do to protect children. Smokers have been presented with the knowledge which second hand smoke is actually harmful to others for many years, yet parents along with some other caregivers continue to smoke around their young charges. Obviously, something some other than educating smokers to the harmful effects must be done to prevent smoking around children.

which can be argued which such a ban could be inherently difficult to enforce. which has also been argued which seat belts laws along with drunken generating laws could be difficult to enforce, yet fewer people drink along with drive along with more people buckle up on the nation's highways. Although true the argument concerning enforcement is actually, remember which is actually often not the legal system itself which prevails individuals via violating ordinances such as smoking bans, drunken generating laws, along with seat belt laws, yet the fear of the legal repercussions of violating the laws. Additionally, many individuals have found which the enactment of smoking bans have given them the incentive they needed to stop smoking themselves, just as states' enactment of brand-new seat belt regulations spurred more individuals to employ the use of their seat belts, regardless of their initial resentment of the legislation. For some people, the right to harm themselves just is actually not worth the fight inside long run.

Source by Rebecca Stigall

Related Post

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *